Dustin Gandof
Introduction
In recent news, there has been a lot of buzz around actor Ben Affleck’s comments on Netflix’s production process.
The Debate
Assembly Line Process vs. Artist-Led Studio
Ben Affleck, along with his longtime friend and collaborator Matt Damon, has recently announced the launch of their own film studio – a studio that is ‘artist-led’ and aims to give more creative control to the filmmakers. In contrast, Affleck has criticized Netflix’s ‘assembly line process’ of making films, stating that it is an ‘impossible job.’
The Pros and Cons of an Assembly Line Process
On one hand, having a streamlined system of producing films can lead to faster turnaround times, higher output, and more opportunities for filmmakers to get their work out into the world. However, some argue that this process can stifle creativity and prevent unique stories and visions from being told. Affleck seems to fall into this camp, believing that the lack of creative control in an assembly line process ultimately leads to lower-quality films.
What Does This Mean for the Future of Filmmaking?
It’s clear that there are differing opinions on how films should be produced, and it’s likely that both approaches will continue to exist in the industry. However, with more and more artists and filmmakers pushing for greater creative control and a more individualistic approach to filmmaking, it’s possible that the assembly line process may become less dominant in the future.
Conclusion
Ben Affleck’s comments on Netflix’s production process have sparked an important conversation surrounding the future of filmmaking. While there are valid arguments to be made on both sides, it’s clear that artists and filmmakers are pushing for more creative control and a more personalized approach to the craft. Only time will tell how the industry will change to accommodate these desires.
